Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.

Peptide-based formula was well-tolerated as either an initial formula or as a transition feeding in children who required long-term home enteral nutrition

Peptamen Junior® peptide-based formulas from Nestlé Health Science

In children intolerant of standard polymeric formula, transition to peptide-based formula (Peptamen Junior®) was associated with significant reductions in provider visits, phone calls and emergency department visits.

66%
reduction inprovider visitsp 0.007
73%
reduction inphone callsp 0.026
86%
reduction inemergency department visitsp 0.025
Study Summary

Transition to Peptide Based Formula is Associated with Greater Tolerability and Reduction in Healthcare Utilization in Children Receiving Enteral Nutrition

Elfadil OM, Steien D, Narasimhan R, Epp L, Velapati S, Patel I, Patel J, Hurt R, Mundi M.
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 2022; 46(3): 626-634. DOI:10.1002/jpen.2202.

Introduction

Prevalence of home enteral nutrition (HEN) has increased significantly over the past few decades. Enteral feeding intolerance (EFI) is a frequent cause of suboptimal nutrition in children on HEN and is defined as the presence of gastrointestinal (GI) distress, significant gastric residual volume and suboptimal delivery of enteral nutrition (EN).

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess changes in GI tolerance and healthcare utilization in children receiving peptide-based HEN (PBD).

Methods

This was a retrospective review of the electronic medical records of children <18 years of age and receiving at least 80% of nutrition needs from EN between October 2015 and October 2019.

Results

Study Population
Total Patients30 children
PBD-i21 (70%) directly started on PBD as an initial formula
PBD-t9 (30%) initiated on a standard polymeric formula (SPF) and later transitioned to a PBD
Sex66.7% male
Mean Age, PBD-i8.4 years
Mean Age, PBD-t10.2 years
Indications for use of enteral nutrition (EN):
Malnutrition, dysphagia, poor oral intake/feeding difficulties and bridge to oral feeding
Indications for use of PBD:
Malnutrition, pancreatic insufficiency, and current or past intolerance to SPF

Patients receiving PBD-i were on their formula for a median of 37 weeks with a median weight gain of 2.6 kg. Those receiving PBD-t were on PBD for a median of 22 weeks and experienced median weight loss of 0.5 kg while on SPF, and median weight gain of 2.7 kg while on PBD. Patients were able to consume 94.8% of goal energy needs from PBD, as compared to 73.3% from SPF formulas. After transition to PBD, no symptoms were reported in 6 of 9 patients (66.7%).

94.8%of goal energy needs consumed from PBDvs. 73.3% from SPF formulas
+2.7 kgmedian weight gain while on PBD (PBD-t)vs. median weight loss of 0.5 kg while on SPF
Figure 1 shows the reduction in GI distress with a transition to PBD (P=0.45)
(%)
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

33.3

 

11.1

 

55.6

 

11.1

 

22.2

 

0.0

 

11.1

 

0.0

 

11.1

 

0.0

 
Diarrhea
Nausea/ Vomiting
Abdominal Pain/ Cramping
Gas/ Bloating
Constipation
 SPF
 PBD
66.7%had no symptoms reportedafter transition to PBD (6 of 9 patients)
Figure 2 shows that healthcare utilization also significantly declined after transition to PBD.
2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0

1.67

 

0.56

 

1.22

 

0.33

 

0.78

 

0.11

 
Provider visitsp 0.007
Phone callsp 0.026
Emergency Department visitsp 0.025
 SPF
 PBD
 
Conclusion

In children who required long-term HEN, PBD was well-tolerated as either an initial HEN formula or as a transition feeding. In SPF-intolerant children, transition to PBD resulted in significant improvement in HEN tolerance and a reduction in healthcare utilization.

USE UNDER MEDICAL SUPERVISION